diff options
author | Martin Polden <mpolden@mpolden.no> | 2020-01-13 16:16:19 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Martin Polden <mpolden@mpolden.no> | 2020-01-13 16:17:32 +0100 |
commit | e22bb6f5ca207e897dcde8a65416f46f2a039583 (patch) | |
tree | 4a6b7fbf095a853e71fc7fd3bee354f9952049fc | |
parent | 4e2478aabcd2ed3945ac0294cefd2cf325e39bbf (diff) |
Revert "Remove unnecessary content/combined substitution"
This reverts commit 0e3637dfdd8c7301cefe986c889971efad1f3781.
Removed too early. Need to wait until old config models disappear.
3 files changed, 34 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/config-provisioning/src/main/java/com/yahoo/config/provision/ClusterSpec.java b/config-provisioning/src/main/java/com/yahoo/config/provision/ClusterSpec.java index 16369d82f9f..f1a8b579866 100644 --- a/config-provisioning/src/main/java/com/yahoo/config/provision/ClusterSpec.java +++ b/config-provisioning/src/main/java/com/yahoo/config/provision/ClusterSpec.java @@ -90,8 +90,10 @@ public final class ClusterSpec { * are ignored. */ public boolean satisfies(ClusterSpec other) { - return other.id.equals(this.id) && - other.type.equals(this.type); + if ( ! other.id.equals(this.id)) return false; // ID mismatch + // TODO(mpolden): Remove this after January 2019, once all nodes in combined clusters have type combined. + if (other.type.isContent() || this.type.isContent()) return other.type.isContent() == this.type.isContent(); + return other.type.equals(this.type); } /** A cluster type */ diff --git a/config-provisioning/src/test/java/com/yahoo/config/provision/ClusterSpecTest.java b/config-provisioning/src/test/java/com/yahoo/config/provision/ClusterSpecTest.java index dc198e5bb0d..db90b0ebff9 100644 --- a/config-provisioning/src/test/java/com/yahoo/config/provision/ClusterSpecTest.java +++ b/config-provisioning/src/test/java/com/yahoo/config/provision/ClusterSpecTest.java @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ public class ClusterSpecTest { List.of(spec(ClusterSpec.Type.admin, "id1"), spec(ClusterSpec.Type.container, "id1")), false, List.of(spec(ClusterSpec.Type.admin, "id1"), spec(ClusterSpec.Type.content, "id1")), false, List.of(spec(ClusterSpec.Type.combined, "id1"), spec(ClusterSpec.Type.container, "id1")), false, - List.of(spec(ClusterSpec.Type.combined, "id1"), spec(ClusterSpec.Type.content, "id1")), false, + List.of(spec(ClusterSpec.Type.combined, "id1"), spec(ClusterSpec.Type.content, "id1")), true, List.of(spec(ClusterSpec.Type.content, "id1"), spec(ClusterSpec.Type.content, "id1")), true ); tests.forEach((specs, satisfies) -> { diff --git a/node-repository/src/test/java/com/yahoo/vespa/hosted/provision/provisioning/ProvisioningTest.java b/node-repository/src/test/java/com/yahoo/vespa/hosted/provision/provisioning/ProvisioningTest.java index 8fde8cae399..f2c9c409fdb 100644 --- a/node-repository/src/test/java/com/yahoo/vespa/hosted/provision/provisioning/ProvisioningTest.java +++ b/node-repository/src/test/java/com/yahoo/vespa/hosted/provision/provisioning/ProvisioningTest.java @@ -651,6 +651,35 @@ public class ProvisioningTest { tester.activate(application, state.allHosts); } + @Test + public void change_to_combined_cluster_does_not_change_node_allocation() { + var tester = new ProvisioningTester.Builder().zone(new Zone(Environment.prod, RegionName.from("us-east"))).build(); + var application = tester.makeApplicationId(); + + tester.makeReadyNodes(4, defaultResources); + + // Application allocates two content nodes initially. This is the old behaviour where combined clusters has type + // content + ClusterSpec cluster = ClusterSpec.request(ClusterSpec.Type.content, + ClusterSpec.Id.from("combined"), + Version.fromString("1.2.3"), + false); + var initialNodes = tester.activate(application, tester.prepare(application, cluster, + Capacity.fromCount(2, defaultResources, false, false), + 1)); + + // Application is redeployed with cluster type combined + cluster = ClusterSpec.request(ClusterSpec.Type.combined, + ClusterSpec.Id.from("combined"), + Version.fromString("1.2.3"), + false); + var newNodes = tester.activate(application, tester.prepare(application, cluster, + Capacity.fromCount(2, defaultResources, false, false), + 1)); + + assertEquals("Node allocation remains the same", initialNodes, newNodes); + } + private SystemState prepare(ApplicationId application, int container0Size, int container1Size, int content0Size, int content1Size, NodeResources flavor, ProvisioningTester tester) { return prepare(application, container0Size, container1Size, content0Size, content1Size, flavor, |