Rename the 'searchdefinition' package to 'schema'

1 files changed, 51 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/config-model/src/main/java/com/yahoo/schema/processing/WordMatch.java b/config-model/src/main/java/com/yahoo/schema/processing/WordMatch.java
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1e312b71afd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/config-model/src/main/java/com/yahoo/schema/processing/WordMatch.java
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// Copyright Yahoo. Licensed under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. See LICENSE in the project root.
+package com.yahoo.schema.processing;
+
+import com.yahoo.config.application.api.DeployLogger;
+import com.yahoo.schema.RankProfileRegistry;
+import com.yahoo.schema.document.MatchType;
+import com.yahoo.schema.document.SDField;
+import com.yahoo.schema.document.Stemming;
+import com.yahoo.schema.Schema;
+import com.yahoo.vespa.model.container.search.QueryProfiles;
+
+/**
+ * The implementation of word matching - with word matching the field is assumed to contain a single "word" - some
+ * contiguous sequence of word and number characters - but without changing the data at the indexing side (as with text
+ * matching) to enforce this. Word matching is thus almost like exact matching on the indexing side (no action taken),
+ * and like text matching on the query side. This may be suitable for attributes, where people both expect the data to
+ * be left as in the input document, and trivially written queries to work by default. However, this may easily lead to
+ * data which cannot be matched at all as the indexing and query side does not agree.
+ *
+ * @author bratseth
+ */
+public class WordMatch extends Processor {
+
+    public WordMatch(Schema schema, DeployLogger deployLogger, RankProfileRegistry rankProfileRegistry, QueryProfiles queryProfiles) {
+        super(schema, deployLogger, rankProfileRegistry, queryProfiles);
+    }
+
+    public void process(boolean validate, boolean documentsOnly) {
+        for (SDField field : schema.allConcreteFields()) {
+            processFieldRecursive(field);
+        }
+    }
+
+    private void processFieldRecursive(SDField field) {
+        processField(field);
+        for (SDField structField : field.getStructFields()) {
+            processField(structField);
+        }
+    }
+
+    private void processField(SDField field) {
+        if (!field.getMatching().getType().equals(MatchType.WORD)) {
+            return;
+        }
+        field.setStemming(Stemming.NONE);
+        field.getNormalizing().inferLowercase();
+        field.addQueryCommand("word");
+    }
+
+
+}