diff options
author | Henning Baldersheim <balder@yahoo-inc.com> | 2022-08-16 15:30:21 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Henning Baldersheim <balder@yahoo-inc.com> | 2022-08-16 15:30:21 +0000 |
commit | e3da754202e029c2598876ddbf2b32bfc6a7d151 (patch) | |
tree | ff3201308db45ba740447b35e393408cb58ee688 /searchlib/src/tests/ranksetup/verify_feature | |
parent | 7dd6b3c14864da5b7b75ae11de7ef7ec1442fe10 (diff) |
Make the message a pair of level and string
Diffstat (limited to 'searchlib/src/tests/ranksetup/verify_feature')
-rw-r--r-- | searchlib/src/tests/ranksetup/verify_feature/verify_feature_test.cpp | 89 |
1 files changed, 53 insertions, 36 deletions
diff --git a/searchlib/src/tests/ranksetup/verify_feature/verify_feature_test.cpp b/searchlib/src/tests/ranksetup/verify_feature/verify_feature_test.cpp index 5cb9974bf50..6d49704e7c1 100644 --- a/searchlib/src/tests/ranksetup/verify_feature/verify_feature_test.cpp +++ b/searchlib/src/tests/ranksetup/verify_feature/verify_feature_test.cpp @@ -15,6 +15,18 @@ using vespalib::make_string_short::fmt; typedef bool (*cmp)(const vespalib::string & a, const vespalib::string &b); +namespace search::fef { +std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &os, Level level) { + if (level == Level::INFO) { + return os << "info"; + } + if (level == Level::WARNING) { + return os << "warning"; + } + return os << "error"; +} +} + bool equal(const vespalib::string & a, const vespalib::string &b) { return a == b; } @@ -33,12 +45,13 @@ struct RankFixture { factory.addPrototype(std::make_shared<ValueBlueprint>()); } - bool verify(const std::string &feature, std::vector<std::pair<cmp, vespalib::string>> expected) const { - std::vector<vespalib::string> errors; + bool verify(const std::string &feature, std::vector<std::pair<cmp, Message>> expected) const { + std::vector<Message> errors; bool ok = verifyFeature(factory, indexEnv, feature, "feature verification test", errors); EXPECT_EQUAL(errors.size(), expected.size()); for (size_t i(0); i < std::min(errors.size(), expected.size()); i++) { - EXPECT_TRUE(expected[i].first(errors[i], expected[i].second)); + EXPECT_EQUAL(errors[i].first, expected[i].second.first); + EXPECT_TRUE(expected[i].first(errors[i].second, expected[i].second.second)); } return ok; } @@ -52,62 +65,66 @@ TEST_F("verify valid rank feature", RankFixture) { TEST_F("verify unknown feature", RankFixture) { EXPECT_FALSE(f1.verify("unknown", - {{equal, "invalid rank feature 'unknown': unknown basename: 'unknown'"}, - {equal, "verification failed: rank feature 'unknown' (feature verification test)"}})); + {{equal, {Level::WARNING, "invalid rank feature 'unknown': unknown basename: 'unknown'"}}, + {equal, {Level::ERROR, "verification failed: rank feature 'unknown' (feature verification test)"}}})); } TEST_F("verify unknown output", RankFixture) { EXPECT_FALSE(f1.verify("value(1, 2, 3).3", - {{equal, "invalid rank feature 'value(1,2,3).3': unknown output: '3'"}, - {equal, "verification failed: rank feature 'value(1, 2, 3).3' (feature verification test)"}})); + {{equal, {Level::WARNING, "invalid rank feature 'value(1,2,3).3': unknown output: '3'"}}, + {equal, {Level::ERROR, "verification failed: rank feature 'value(1, 2, 3).3' (feature verification test)"}}})); } TEST_F("verify illegal input parameters", RankFixture) { EXPECT_FALSE(f1.verify("value.0", - {{equal, "invalid rank feature 'value.0': The parameter list used for setting up rank feature value is not valid: Expected 1+1x parameter(s), but got 0"}, - {equal, "verification failed: rank feature 'value.0' (feature verification test)"}})); + {{equal, {Level::WARNING, "invalid rank feature 'value.0':" + " The parameter list used for setting up rank feature value is not valid:" + " Expected 1+1x parameter(s), but got 0"}}, + {equal, {Level::ERROR, "verification failed: rank feature 'value.0' (feature verification test)"}}})); } TEST_F("verify illegal feature name", RankFixture) { EXPECT_FALSE(f1.verify("value(2).", - {{equal, "invalid rank feature 'value(2).': malformed name"}, - {equal, "verification failed: rank feature 'value(2).' (feature verification test)"}})); + {{equal, {Level::WARNING, "invalid rank feature 'value(2).': malformed name"}}, + {equal, {Level::ERROR, "verification failed: rank feature 'value(2).' (feature verification test)"}}})); } TEST_F("verify too deep dependency graph", RankFixture) { EXPECT_TRUE(f1.verify("chain(basic, 255, 4)", {})); EXPECT_FALSE(f1.verify("chain(basic, 256, 4)", {{equal, - "invalid rank feature 'value(4)': dependency graph too deep\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,1,4)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,2,4)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,3,4)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,4,4)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,5,4)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,6,4)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,7,4)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,8,4)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,9,4)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,10,4)'\n" - " (skipped 241 entries)\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,252,4)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,253,4)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,254,4)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,255,4)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,256,4)'\n"}, - {regex, "high stack usage: [0-9]+ bytes"}, - {equal, "verification failed: rank feature 'chain(basic, 256, 4)' (feature verification test)"}})); + {Level::WARNING, + "invalid rank feature 'value(4)': dependency graph too deep\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,1,4)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,2,4)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,3,4)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,4,4)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,5,4)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,6,4)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,7,4)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,8,4)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,9,4)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,10,4)'\n" + " (skipped 241 entries)\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,252,4)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,253,4)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,254,4)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,255,4)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(basic,256,4)'\n"}}, + {regex, {Level::WARNING, "high stack usage: [0-9]+ bytes"}}, + {equal, {Level::ERROR, "verification failed: rank feature 'chain(basic, 256, 4)' (feature verification test)"}}})); } TEST_F("verify dependency cycle", RankFixture) { EXPECT_FALSE(f1.verify("chain(cycle, 4, 2)", {{equal, - "invalid rank feature 'chain(cycle,2,2)': dependency cycle detected\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(cycle,1,2)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(cycle,2,2)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(cycle,3,2)'\n" - " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(cycle,4,2)'\n"}, - {equal,"verification failed: rank feature 'chain(cycle, 4, 2)' (feature verification test)"}})); + {Level::WARNING, + "invalid rank feature 'chain(cycle,2,2)': dependency cycle detected\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(cycle,1,2)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(cycle,2,2)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(cycle,3,2)'\n" + " ... needed by rank feature 'chain(cycle,4,2)'\n"}}, + {equal, {Level::ERROR, "verification failed: rank feature 'chain(cycle, 4, 2)' (feature verification test)"}}})); } TEST_MAIN() { TEST_RUN_ALL(); } |